Monday, January 22, 2007

The Murder Count

1:03pm. Murder in the second degree. Dwyer: "When in the course or commission of robbery in the first or second degree, or immediate flight therefrom, that person causes the death of a person other than one of the participants."

-Healy as a blank expression on his face.

-There are 231 exhibits. While deliberating, the jury has the right to view each and every one of them. They are stacked in boxes and folders here in the courtroom.

23 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

I'm betting the jury gets hung up on this charge.

1:06 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

i bet the jury dont all agree

1:08 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I'm betting not. Read the law people.Do your homework.

1:09 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

let's really hope that they all do agree. its a pretty open and closed case

1:09 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

They will agree that he is guilty as charged as the above said do your homework. What is there to get hung up on. He is guilty!

1:11 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

i high doubt it will end today dont get your hopes up.with all the evidence concerns they have to look into that

1:11 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

highly correction

1:11 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

and as the judge stated they can look at each and every piece of evidence and take there sweet time doing so if thats what it takes.again i doubt will end today but of course could be wrong.

1:16 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

What kind of sentence does armed robbery carry? Long enough to put him in jail for 20 years to life in case he's acquitted of the murder count?

1:21 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

for the families sake I hope it does end today. it's been almost a year I think they have had enough and am sure that they are ready for closure

1:21 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Look I followed the trial just like all of you and i'm trying to look at this objectively and as the average person. The issue that was raised is when does the flight from a crime end ? is when the person is on the ground with a handcuff on and a police officer laying on top of him or is it when he is in the back of a patrol car ? That is the issue that was raised and that is what I was concerned about.

1:23 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I think Wittman is grabbing at straws (or should I say gloves). Does she think she is defending O.J.? I think she herself should have looked back into a few of the testimonies. I believe (and I was not in the courtroom) that it was stated from more than one that a crash was heard a short time before Ms Liesch pleaded for her life. There was time for him to break the case and get into the office. I truly hope all the jurors have listened carefully and see that he is as guilty as hell. Best wishes to the Corr family and ALL employees of the jewelry store and all who testified against the defendent.

1:27 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Healy with a blank expression????

It is about time....

I thought that s____ ___grin
was attched to his face for ever...

1:57 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

With regard to what 1:23 said, You are forgetting: "Or another participant"..... Healy was apparently still struggling with officers while "Another participant"--armed with a handgun-fired the shot. Therefore, he was not actually "In custody". He was merely in the resisting arrest phase of his capture while the other participany was causing he death of a non-participant

1:57 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I believe the flight ended when he was in custody.

By law as explained in Miranda, you are in custody, not when the officer cuffs you but at any time when you are "not free to leave".

Police testified that they had him on the ground with a gun to his head and a knee in his back. Cuffs where not on, but to a reasonable person, was Healy free to leave? I say no and that is when his flight ceased. (all prior to the shot fired)

The glove. A U. S. Supreme Court case opined in a fairly recent case that "IF THE CHAIN Of CUSTODY IS INCOMPLETE,THE EVIDENCE IS INSUFFICIENT TO FIND HIM GUILTY".

If convicted, this is a great issue for appeal, amongst the many that already exist.

2:09 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Evidence trail looks bleek. The only time that it was sufficiently handled was when the State Police received it and properly handled, labeled and documented their acquisition of such.

2:11 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

the glove may not fit,, but the shoes do!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

2:29 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

why didnt they take a dna from the shoes then????

2:31 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

i wish healy was double jointed, so that he can turn around and kick his own ass with his stolen PARADA SHOES !!!!!!!!!!!! HOPEFULLY THE SHOEEEEEEE WILL GET STUCK...............

2:38 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Has anyone been able to view the prosecuters closing arguments? The link is there, but un-linkable

2:39 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

WELL, IF THE SHOE GETS STUCK IN HIS ASS THEN WE WILL GET MOREEEEE DNA HOW ABOUT THAT!!!!!!!!

2:40 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

WELL, IF THE SHOE GETS STUCK IN HIS ASS THEN WE WILL GET MOREEEEE DNA HOW ABOUT THAT!!!!!!!!

2:40 PM  
Blogger Jerry Walsh - WKTV said...

We are getting ready to publish video of the the prosecution's closing right now. The tape is about 40 minutes and it needs to be put into our system in real time.

Check back to www.wktv.com for the latest video clips.

Jerry Walsh - WKTV

2:49 PM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home